Commons:Deletion requests/File:Kilburn Bell 1.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
File:Kilburn Bell 1.jpg[edit]
Copyvio, COM:DW of copyrighted artwork, not 3D. Rodhullandemu (talk) 11:39, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
- Keep - this is a sign which is permanently installed on public display, as per Commons:Freedom of panorama Cnbrb (talk) 11:52, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
- Keep - Not only that its taken from a free image. See https://www.freeimages.com/photo/old-bell-1226072 and https://www.freeimages.com/license. Yet another piece otf time wasting deletionsism run riot. If your going to be a deletionist at least do your homework. ... Broichmore (talk) 12:04, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
- Comment @Cnbrb: Does not benefit from Freedom of Panorama as the painting is a 2D rather than a 3D work. @Broichmore: The photograph may be free but the painting is still copyright and the so-called "free image" is a breach of copyright of the artist who painted the sign. I was an admin here for over five years, so perhaps you could refrain from assuming that I don't know what I'm talking about. The vast majority of photos of pub signs we host here are such violations, and the only reason we still have them is that nobody has yet nominated them for deletion. Perhaps I'll do that in the light of such a display of ignorance of copyright and licensing policy here. Rodhullandemu (talk) 12:15, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
- Comment Noted (grudgingly) re. the 2D/3D distinction. I'm going to assume that the rest of that was directed at Broichmore and not me. Cnbrb (talk) 14:56, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
- Comment I have also had a look at the licensing conditions on the source page, since it's been added. However, their licence is incompatible with any of the licences we allow here, because it limits use and is therefore (in Creative Commons terms) an "NC" licence, which we do not accept, and never have. Rodhullandemu (talk) 12:26, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
- Comment @Cnbrb: Does not benefit from Freedom of Panorama as the painting is a 2D rather than a 3D work. @Broichmore: The photograph may be free but the painting is still copyright and the so-called "free image" is a breach of copyright of the artist who painted the sign. I was an admin here for over five years, so perhaps you could refrain from assuming that I don't know what I'm talking about. The vast majority of photos of pub signs we host here are such violations, and the only reason we still have them is that nobody has yet nominated them for deletion. Perhaps I'll do that in the light of such a display of ignorance of copyright and licensing policy here. Rodhullandemu (talk) 12:15, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, per discussion. Taivo (talk) 12:47, 22 March 2021 (UTC)