Commons:Deletion requests/File:Manchester metrolink logo.PNG
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
File:Manchester metrolink logo.PNG[edit]
How can a crop or re-drawing of a presumably copyrighted logo be under a free license? English Wikipedia has en:File:Metrolink new logo.jpg as "fair use".
Probably this should be moved back to en-WP as "fair use". Doing so may break a few templates on other wikis. (However, most uses appear to be at en-WP.) Lupo 09:56, 25 August 2014 (UTC)
- If this gets moved back to en-WP, File:Victoria 2014-08-22 22-18.jpg should also be deleted. Lupo 09:59, 25 August 2014 (UTC)
Kept: kept as PD-textlogo Krd 12:52, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
File:Manchester metrolink logo.PNG[edit]
This is not a simple logo based on the low standard of originality the UK applies. An image utlising this logo was under "fair-use" on english wikipedia. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:11, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose - disagree, this is a collection of cirlces. Logos are permitted on Commons - it's all explained at Commons:Threshold of originality. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cnbrb (talk • contribs) 2017-05-21 12:42 (UTC)
- A collection of circles in an 'organised' pattern, bear in mind the UK has low standard for originality.ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 14:34, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: The UK ToO is very low. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:48, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
