User talk:JD554

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

TUSC token c92f8283d04dd8ee8f13eb42229e2b73[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!


File:Kenora_Mural.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eusebius (talk) 09:16, 23 July 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Deletion requests[edit]

Don't forget to add deletion requests to the deletion request log. It seems like you have been forgetting. I added Commons:Deletion requests/File:Nirvana album cover.jpg, but you should go back and check any others you stated. See Commons:Deletion requests/listing a request manually. – Zntrip 00:04, 6 August 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Re: Irish coins[edit]

Thank you for the warning. Those scans were uploaded in good faith, before a clarification about the enforced copyright for coins was made. Bye. --Paginazero (talk) 09:55, 6 August 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Oh, I have no doubt they were. Cheers --JD554 (talk) 10:42, 6 August 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Irish decimal coinage pic[edit]

Hi JD554,

I only got an email about that image of the Irish coins you notified me about just now. I took that image; it was of my own coins. I'm guessing I forgot to put a license on it (it was a while ago!) but I'm perfectly happy for it to be PD-licensed.

Regards, --Ludraman

Beatles[edit]

I have reponse you... :)--Cemg (talk) 11:09, 30 January 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Vannucci.jpg[edit]

asturianu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  euskara  français  galego  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  македонски  русский  українська  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Vannucci.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Vannucci.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Original picture don't have valid source and I have remarked it, so it's mean that your uploaded picture needs also source if original will deleted----Motopark (talk) 17:00, 18 July 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Wedgwood Rock[edit]

I don't know where you got the spelling "Wedgewood Rock", but it is the "Wedgwood Rock", like Josiah Wedgwood. - Jmabel ! talk 17:22, 5 January 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Copyright Watcher Barnstar
Excellent detective work at Commons:Deletion requests/File:LITTLE COMPTON STREET.JPG, especially since you found the source within 10 minutes of the deletion nomination. I'm impressed. Keep up the good work. Senator2029talk 21:29, 29 April 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Woods and forest[edit]

How do you define the difference between a wood and a forest? It's entirely abitrary - simply deciding by name doesn't work : Bishop Wood is clearly a forest. etcOranjblud (talk) 13:54, 4 May 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:U2360-Suu Kyi-tribute.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

russavia (talk) 12:02, 25 July 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Southwark Bridge City Plaque.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Hchc2009 (talk) 16:56, 13 February 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Vannucci.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ringerfan23 (talk) 16:19, 6 August 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Morrissey and Marr.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Marchjuly (talk) 06:07, 26 June 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Adamant1 (talk) 20:31, 8 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]